The Beekeeper Review: Jason Statham Stings, But the Script is All Wax

The Beekeeper Review
Based on direction, story, and acting
What Works (The Good)
- Jason Statham does what Jason Statham does best — he's a stoic, efficient, and genuinely intimidating action hero
- The 'beekeeper' premise is absurd in the best way — it's a secret society of lethal apiary enthusiasts
- The action sequences are brutal, fast, and well-choreographed
- Jeremy Irons is clearly having a blast as the smarmy villain
- The film doesn't take itself too seriously — it knows it's a B-movie, and it leans into it
What Doesn't (The Bad)
- The plot is a nonsense scaffolding for action sequences — nothing makes sense
- Emmy Raver-Lampman's FBI agent is a generic cop character with no personality
- The bee puns are relentless and sometimes groan-worthy
- The villain's plan is needlessly convoluted
- The film is aggressively dumb, even for an action movie
The Setup: Jason Statham Kills People For Bees
There's a very specific subgenre of action movie that The Beekeeper belongs to — the "Jason Statham kicks everyone's ass for a vaguely personal reason" film. It's a genre that includes The Equalizer, John Wick, and Homefront. It's a genre that relies entirely on Statham's stoic charisma and the audience's willingness to accept absurd premises.
The Beekeeper has one of the most absurd premises of all. Statham plays Adam Clay, a retired operative who lives a quiet life as a beekeeper. He's a man of few words. He tends to his hives. He sells honey at the local farmers' market. He's at peace.
Then his landlady, a kind-hearted woman named Eloise (Phylicia Rashad), is scammed out of her life savings by a sophisticated phishing operation. She kills herself. And Adam Clay goes to war.
What follows is a violent, bloody, and surprisingly funny revenge story that involves a secret society of lethal beekeepers, a corrupt tech billionaire, the FBI, and a lot of bee puns.
The Plot: A Nonsense Scaffolding
The plot is nonsense. It's a series of escalating set pieces held together by the thinnest of threads. Adam Clay tracks down the scammers. He kills them. He moves up the chain. He finds the billionaire. He kills more people. The FBI gets involved. They're incompetent. He kills more people.
The "beekeeper" society is an absurd concept. It's a secret organisation of elite assassins who are also beekeepers. They speak in bee metaphors. They have a hierarchy that revolves around hives and queens. They're like the High Table from John Wick, but if the High Table had a thing for honey.
The film doesn't explain any of this. It doesn't want to. It's not interested in world-building. It's interested in watching Jason Statham beat people up with the cold efficiency of a man who has made peace with his own violence.
The Action: Brutal, Efficient, and Satisfying
The action sequences are the best part of the film. David Ayer — the director of Fury, End of Watch, and Training Day — knows how to stage violence. The fights are fast, brutal, and visceral. Statham doesn't do flashy kung fu. He doesn't do acrobatics. He uses his environment. He uses his fists. He uses whatever is available to him. He's a blunt instrument, and he's very, very effective.
There's a sequence in a convenience store that is a masterclass in grounded action. There's a sequence in a bar that is pure catharsis. The climax, in a seaside mansion, is appropriately explosive.
The Acting: Statham and Irons
Jason Statham is not a versatile actor. He doesn't need to be. He's a movie star. He has a screen presence that is impossible to manufacture. He's convincing as a man who has seen too much, done too much, and is now trying to find peace. His performance is stoic, minimal, and entirely effective.
Jeremy Irons as the villain is clearly having the time of his life. He's playing a smarmy, arrogant tech billionaire who thinks he's untouchable. He's the kind of villain you love to hate. He's given some of the best lines in the film, and he delivers them with relish.
Emmy Raver-Lampman as the FBI agent is the weak link. She's not a bad actress, but she's given a generic role. Her character exists to provide exposition and to be one step behind the protagonist. She's not interesting. She's not memorable.
The Verdict: A Dumb, Fun, Forgettable Ride
The Beekeeper is not a good film. The plot is nonsense. The world-building is absurd. The bee puns are relentless. But it's also a genuinely entertaining action movie. Statham is in top form. The action is brutal. The film knows exactly what it is, and it delivers that with confidence.
If you're a fan of Statham, you'll enjoy it. If you're a fan of action movies, you'll enjoy it. If you're looking for a nuanced character study, look elsewhere.
Score: 6.5/10
Verdict: One-Time Watch. Turn off your brain, enjoy the violence, and don't think too hard about the bee puns. It's a fun ride while it lasts.
The writer of this review has watched the convenience store sequence four times. It's the highlight of the film. Statham is a national treasure.
The Cineverse Technical Breakdown
More in Hollywood
View all Hollywood reviews →
Transformers: Age of Extinction Review — The Dinobots Deserved a Better Movie
After the Battle of Chicago, the Autobots are hunted by a government agency, and a struggling inventor discovers a deactivated Optimus Prime in a forgotten theatre.

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen Review — Bigger, Louder, and Somehow Dumber
Sam Witwicky goes to college, but his problems follow him — including a resurrected Megatron and an ancient Decepticon who wants to destroy the sun.

Transformers Review: When Giant Robots Made Us Believe in Movies Again
A teenager buys a beat-up car that turns out to be an alien robot, and finds himself caught in the middle of a war between the Autobots and Decepticons.